One of many gauntlets.

Today's post be the result of an ongoing discussion between Kermit and the Monster. Me were gonna do something different, but me had so much fun with this that Me just had to share it with you.

This be Me reply to he commentary on the posts titled: Riddle Me This... and Yer Blog be Dumb

Kermit, Me tenacious, bombastic detractor. Me gonna write this slowly so that you may ruminate upon me words and see iffin we can put this thing to rest. Me has a post that me wants to write and this continued banter is becoming utterly tiresome.

1. That you were under the impression that me post were about reducing the seriousness of a topic from importance to paltriness is because you assigned that idea yourself. Me never stated that there were a dearth of comedy in the writings of any of the people mentioned in the post. Please read the post again.

2. If you are trying to reach the widest possible audience and get yer message across, why not use humour? It be the perfect delivery system. The philosophers and poets often utilise obscure imagery and convoluted arguments to defend their theories and abstractions. The comedian speaks in plain language! There be a lot less people who don’t get ‘the Joke’ than there are who can understand the Rawlsian precepts of justice.

3. You have assumed that Camille Alexa (One should always take pains to get someone’s name right.) will no longer visit me home. Unless you are privy to information that Me ain’t, then that is extremely presumptuous of you. That she be confused were something she stated herself and she weren't the first person to visit here to make that statement.
Once again me gonna beseech you to actually read the post. Me weren’t tryin to be funny. Iffin Me were than it would have been painfully obvious.

4. In yer initial reference to the costume party you used hearsay to make yer point (Me let that slide) in yer second reference to the aforementioned party you make it sound as if you had actually attended. Either way you speak fer others and they just might find that offensive. Yer friends just might have been trying to balance things out by inviting some unnaturally black folks.

5. The focus of my criticism of yer blog were to point out that we are all imperfect and ought to respect the failings of others. Me accepted yer insults with what me believes to be the graciousness that a host or hostess must display, but Me cannot condone a gratuitous display of ignorance wrapped up in something that construes and aspires to be erudition or cleverness.

6. There is nothing unusual about people creating artistic sites utilizing their photography or artwork, Me has done that. You may, as you see fit, continue to comment on blogs. That’s what they are there for. Just don’t be surprised that not everyone will agree with yer perceptions and thoughts, Me don’t.
Finally, and me does mean to close this discussion at this time; for Me has already wasted much time with this inane debate about what you have ‘said’. Me not gonna be able to go into the things ya haven’t ‘said’.
Me truly believes that one needs to walk the walk before ya can talk the talk. Ya just happen to be fortunate that ya picked the Monster fer this. If ya tried this shit with Mr. Dyckerson he would have left you slap happy, bound, gagged, sodomized and giggling in a dank, dark cellar.

Do two things fer me pal. Try to be more considerate in the future and don’t delete yer comments. It would make this post incomprehensible.


STOMP.

Post Stomp: Me chooses to mangle the English language as a part of Me character, you seem to do it out of ignorance. Back to school with you, it's safer there.